View Single Post
  #34  
Old 05-03-2022, 03:36 PM
workingonit's Avatar
workingonit workingonit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2021
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 746
workingonit is on a distinguished road
as usual, it's always something

Quote:
Originally Posted by X5chemist View Post
Scooby-Doo asks which listed fitting fits?
Scooby-Doo ??? You're telling me your age; I was already 19 when that premiered on TV in 1969, and of course, I never watched it.

As for which fitting works, actually, none do. Fitting #8 (m8x1)
Name:  M8 x 1 inside threads only turns halfway down on the valve stem.JPG
Views: 157
Size:  78.6 KB #8 on the previously posted list
screws halfway down on the fuel rail Schrader, but doesn't give me any confidence on the thread match. I'll have to use a second fitting to attach it to the gauge's hose.
Name:  adapter plus adapter to fit on tester.JPG
Views: 150
Size:  79.2 KB necessary connection to join to the gauge
The premium Teflon tape would probably seal it, but there's another problem...the fitting doesn't have a "valve depressor" inside.
Name:  bar inside fitting, made to depress the Schrader valve.JPG
Views: 160
Size:  65.7 KB this one isn't even close to working

If I remove the valve core from the Schrader, and join two fittings (plus Teflon tape), I can probably test the pressure. I should probably wear a raincoat, and have my wife stand-by with a fire extinguisher, because I can envision fuel going everywhere.

Why can't I find any mention on the internet of the thread size used on the early E53 (M54) fuel rail? it's like a BMW state secret or something. What did other people use? I can't imagine that the Harbor Freight, and other cheap testing kits have a "BMW-approved" fitting, while my kit doesn't (they're all probably made in the same factory in China).

Meanwhile, in related news: I went ahead (while I had the covers off) and sprayed 3 more cans of carb cleaner, and found zero leaks, again, paying particular attention to the rubber boots, vacuum junctions, injector O-rings, vacuum manifold O-rings, and any BMW plastic connectors. I also waited until everything was warmed up before I observed the MAF readings from idle (700 rpm) to 1k, 1.5k, 2k, and 2.5k. They were consistent with or better than on my previous graph, so I didn't save it.

I also did a couple of WOT pulls, that brought the highest readings, which were off-scale on my small screen. I also did repeated "tap" tests (suggested by EODguy) on the MAF, from finger taps to semi-hard raps with a big screwdriver...the MAF never acknowledged it. I don't think it's the MAF. Or leaks, or O2 sensors, or anyting underhood.

Perhaps, I need to drop the shield over the FPR assembly, and see if there's a vacuum leak there.
__________________
01 BMW X5 E53,3.0i-5L40E, 7/13/01
topas-blau,Leder-grau,"resto-project car"

Here:
14 Lexus ES350,3.5L-U660E
09 HHR Panel,2.2L-4T45E
04 Chevy 2500HD,6.0L-4L80E
98 GMC Sierra 1500,5.7L-4L60E

Gone:
66 Chevelle Malibu 2dr ht.,327>441c.i.-TH350>PGlide/transbrake
08 Cobalt Coupe,2.2L-4T45E
69 & 75 C10s,350c.i.-TH350
86 S10,2.8L-700R4
73 Volvo 142,2.0L-MT4
72 & 73 VW SuperBeetles,1.6l-MT4
64 VW,1.2l-MT4
67 Dodge Monaco 500 2dr ht.,383c.i.-A727
56 Chevy 210 4dr,265c.i.-PGlide
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links