Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > BMW SAV Forums > X5 (E53) Forum
Arnott
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-26-2015, 09:21 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 255
TurnAround is on a distinguished road
Best Toe In/Out setting for 'go kart' driving + good tire wear?

Getting new tires for the X in a couple weeks. I figured, I should get the alignment done too.

When I did the suspension on my Coupe I remember going through a whole discussion about whether I should go exactly with the factory toe setting on the front wheels, or modify it a little to make the car more fun to drive. I really like having a sensitive rapid response 'turn in' on a car. More of a go kart fun feel. Then again, I want to maximize my tire wear and not grind off the outside shoulders. If the inside shoulder gets a little more worn.. ehh...

I can't remember exactly what the final answer was though. Do you guys know; Is it that you can go with a little toe out and that will make the car have better more responsive turn in, but will risk wearing the inside (not visible) inner shoulders a bit? So like.. a little toe out would actually protect the outer shoulders from grinding more? Or, maybe I've got that wrong.

Or, is it too risky for tire wear to mess with toe on an X5 (heavy vehicle) and I should just stick with factory?

Can you set me straight" (alignment pun)

Thanks
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links

  #2  
Old 02-26-2015, 09:33 PM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Hobart, Australia
Posts: 480
ants_oz is on a distinguished road
Inside edges are most affected by toe. The closer to neutral then tow out, the greater the wear on the inside edge.

Outside edge is most affected by camber angle.

Toe-in will generally provide a more neutral feel to the handling - greater propensity for the steering to self-centre. The closer you get to neutral then toe-out, the less self-centre effect will be present. The vehicle will be more likely to follow road camber, and generally be less-stable in the straight-ahead position.
__________________
Cheers,

Anthony
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-27-2015, 03:16 PM
TiAgX5's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Coppell,TX
Posts: 3,489
TiAgX5 is on a distinguished road
The first step in getting "go-kart" response is replacing all the soft rubber suspension & swaybar bushings/ steering rack mounts and subframe mounting points with harder materials.


Powerflex black series is around 80% stiffer then new BMW OE.

Another change to make is lighter wheels/tires (I run 255/285/19s on Ultralight wheels). This has the same effect on handling as stiffer springs, shocks and swaybars. I'm OCD about unsprung weight and also installed drilled & slotted rotors and lighter Cool Carbon hollow ceramic pads.


My next purchase is.........
Attached Images
 
__________________
'03 X5 4.4 Sport, last of the M62s (8-03 build date)
I believe in deadication to craftmanship in a world of mediocrity!

Last edited by TiAgX5; 02-27-2015 at 03:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-28-2015, 01:56 AM
admranger's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,636
admranger is on a distinguished road
Don't do it. This isn't a sports car. I have two M3's for sporty handling and I have the alignment at the front set to max negative camber and near zero toe. Rear toe I keep at the factory specs as you don't want the rear to be too nimble on a street driven car. On my former race car I had much less toe in than factory and it would certainly pivot.

BTW: go-kart like handling and minimal tire wear are somewhat mutually exclusive, though you can minimize the X5's tire wear by having less negative camber, especially out back (set to the least negative camber within spec).

I'm not too sure about the near solid giubo, TiAg. Having just fussed with these things, added driveline shock isn't something I'd go for, but I'll be curious to hear your experience with it. Seems like a great way to add NVH to the vehicle...especially vibration.
__________________
Kirk
Las Vegas
2016 X5 40e Mineral White/Black Dakota Leather, ZLL, ZCW, ZDA, ZDB, ZPP, multi contour seats, rear side window shades, HK stereo
2011 E90M3, 6-speed manual
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-28-2015, 11:29 AM
TiAgX5's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Coppell,TX
Posts: 3,489
TiAgX5 is on a distinguished road
I also have toe and camber set to minimum specs.

I've been gathering info on the stiffer flex discs from E39 owners who have done it. Only heard from one owner who had vibration issues with the poly unit.

I'm also looking at this, rubber inserts are softer than poly, and less prone to tearing then OE unit......
Attached Images
 
__________________
'03 X5 4.4 Sport, last of the M62s (8-03 build date)
I believe in deadication to craftmanship in a world of mediocrity!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-28-2015, 11:58 AM
tmv's Avatar
tmv tmv is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3,346
tmv is on a distinguished road
Minimum camber and straighten toe setting will give you good tire wear.
Why do you want a "go-kart" setting on a SAV?
__________________

00 E39 DINAN S1 //M5 (82k miles)
06 E53 DINAN 4.8iS, born 2/18/2006 (126k miles) http://www.xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-foru...s-my-dslr.html
90 Straman Z32 TwinTurbo Convertible, (1 of 44 ever made) 5 speed, 444rwhp/451rwtq
01 360 Novitec Spider F1 (26k miles)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-28-2015, 12:29 PM
dkl's Avatar
dkl dkl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 2,949
dkl is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by admranger View Post
Don't do it. This isn't a sports car. I have two M3's for sporty handling and I have the alignment at the front set to max negative camber and near zero toe. Rear toe I keep at the factory specs as you don't want the rear to be too nimble on a street driven car. On my former race car I had much less toe in than factory and it would certainly pivot.

BTW: go-kart like handling and minimal tire wear are somewhat mutually exclusive, though you can minimize the X5's tire wear by having less negative camber, especially out back (set to the least negative camber within spec).

I'm not too sure about the near solid giubo, TiAg. Having just fussed with these things, added driveline shock isn't something I'd go for, but I'll be curious to hear your experience with it. Seems like a great way to add NVH to the vehicle...especially vibration.
BUT get the alignment wrong and the car will have awful handling.
When I got new tires a couple of years ago, I went to a big name chain tire store to get it aligned. The car was pushing horribly afterward (didn't want to change directions) and I'm talking about just normal driving. The alignment specs readout provided were within tolerance, but wasn't dead center on any of them. Mostly just a "good enough" settings

Then I got a yelp coupon from a local race shop and decided to give them a try. These guys were meticulous - every setting was spot on for both sides (They actually spent a bit over an hour fiddling with it to get it just right versus just less than 20 minutes I got from the chain tire store). Had them remove the front strut alignment pins to get as much negative camber up front as it will go (only can get about -0.5* ) and dial out the toe up front to have just a smidge of toe-in so the car won't wander. The rear were in the middle of the OE settings. Wow, what a difference the minor adjustments made to the handling of the car! It's not go-cart like, which the X5 will never be, but at least it's willing to change directions as pointed now

Moral of the story is that you need to find a good OCD technician who knows what he's doing, which is miles above a shop advertising state of the art equipment with incompetent technicians!

BTW...the X5's OE settings for the front will always wear on the outside edges of the tires. Dialing out toe to near zero helps, but won't eliminate it. Front camber isn't adjustable - so, even pulling the camber pins will only gained me -0.5*...but every little bit helps with handling and tire wear The rears with OE settings, you have to play with tire pressure to get even tire wear. Too low pressure and you'll wear the inner edges. Too high pressure and you wear the middle (worse if you have wide rears). So, it's a balancing act and something you'll just have to play with if you stray away from OE tires since the recommended tire pressure was intended mostly for the OE tires.
__________________
2004 X5 3.0i
Born 02/04
Delivered 03/04

Last edited by dkl; 02-28-2015 at 12:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-28-2015, 01:11 PM
TiAgX5's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Coppell,TX
Posts: 3,489
TiAgX5 is on a distinguished road
"Moral of the story is that you need to find a good OCD technician who knows what he's doing"

Good advice!

I got the BMW SA to introduce me to the alignment tech, spoke with him about what I wanted and gave him two $20 bills for lunch. Whenever my vehicle goes in I speak with him and buy him lunch. Money well spent!

Alignments and tire mounting/balancing is all I use the dealer for, and I ALWAYS buy the tech lunch.
__________________
'03 X5 4.4 Sport, last of the M62s (8-03 build date)
I believe in deadication to craftmanship in a world of mediocrity!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-01-2015, 12:23 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 255
TurnAround is on a distinguished road
Thanks for all the posts guys. I'm still slightly confused tho on which front toe setting to go with. But I that is mostly because I don't remember what the BMW recommend spec is. What is the factory spec range? ... slightly toe out, or slightly toe in? iow, I could talk camber and caster all day and follow right along, but I can never remember the 'starting place' for front toe; a little in, or a little out?

What I think I'm hearing is its normally a little toe in, and as long as I can find a good alignment tech that can have a good conversation about it and they can get both sides the same, I should ask them to approach neutral but still slightly in. Is that correct? And that, doing any toe out would not be good, right?

I had the forward bushing replaced last year, but with factory (with the three cutouts and spokes through the middle of the bushing) and now I've got a note to myself to go with solid next time. Mostly because the hollowed out ones contribute to front end shudder during braking. I don't think I'd replace all the other bushings with solid though... probly too harsh of a ride I'd think. Although I totally get what it would do for handling.

Already have the slotted drilled rotors. And I pay attention to tire weight when buying tires (the more weight at the 'outside' of a spinning object, the more damaging to handling and acceleration. Centrifical weight not good)

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-01-2015, 12:56 PM
TiAgX5's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Coppell,TX
Posts: 3,489
TiAgX5 is on a distinguished road
Front total toe; 18', +/- 10'
" camber; -12', +/- 20'

Rear total toe; 18', +/- 10'
" camber; -1. degree 50', +/- 20'
__________________
'03 X5 4.4 Sport, last of the M62s (8-03 build date)
I believe in deadication to craftmanship in a world of mediocrity!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 PM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.