One-On-One With Sarah Palin

[realchef]

Originally Posted by MrLabGuy

Your statement shows your ignorance. If you can't participate with a cogent argument I suggest you stick to the X5 related posts. That or post on the Daily Kos with others who love regurgitated nonsense.

M L G,

help me here

What am I missing? Is this not legit.

[MrLabGuy]

Originally Posted by gresch

If the Democrats weren't scared and in trouble, they would never bring up Palin. Obama isn't running against Palin, he's running against McCain.

Unless he Dems are going to script everything that Obama says, they're in trouble.

Maybe if the Presidential thing doesn't work out, he can move to L.A. and be the new voice over guy for trailers now that Don Lafontaine is off to Valhalla.

The more they ridicule her the more Clinton voters will flock to McCain. Keep up the good work Democrats. The day after election day we'll see a rush for Rehab and detox treatment.

[Krimson X]

Originally Posted by MrLabGuy

Your whole premise is based on Palin harming McCain. Why else would you suggest that she would soon pull out?

One other observation. Wagner, myself and other McCain supporters here have been critical of our candidate yet you and most of the Obama cheerleaders can't seem understand or admit Obama is a weak candidate for President and the Democratic ticket is in trouble.

Why else would McCain be in a statistical tie so far in the campaign? You would think that ANY Democrat with a pulse would be far ahead after 8 years of Bush. Heck...I even think Bush has been a terrible candidate and I voted for the guy. Remember, I've voted Democrat just as many elections as I've voted Republican. I doubt you can say the same.

No. My premise is that Palin comes across in her interviews as dumb as a box of rocks. Despite this appearance, it has not hurt the ticket or persuaded her supporters to realize the same. Whatever bump Palin gave the ticket has diminished tremendously over the past few weeks.

McCain is not Wagner's candidate... unless he has switched his affiliation?

I have voted democratic for every presidential election since 1992. This year will not be any different. I have voted republican twice for Louisiana Govenor. I voted for Jindal in his loss to Kathleen Blanco and in his recent victory.

[MrLabGuy]

Originally Posted by realchef

M L G,

help me here

What am I missing? Is this not legit.

For starters I'd like to see you in the World spotlight after being coached for hours on what to say and not to say in interviews. Her IQ has very little to do with her performance in that particular interview.

Secondly, your generic and uninformed statement about the trooper is just that. Do some homework and try not to repeat what others say who are just as uninformed about the specific details. I'm not going to do your homework for you.

[MrLabGuy]

Originally Posted by Krimson X

No. My premise is that Palin comes across in her interviews as dumb as a box of rocks. Despite this appearance, it has not hurt the ticket or persuaded her supporters to realize the same. Whatever bump Palin gave the ticket has diminished tremendously over the past few weeks.

McCain is not Wagner's candidate... unless he has switched his affiliation?

I have voted democratic for every presidential election since 1992. This year will not be any different. I have voted republican twice for Louisiana Govenor. I voted for Jindal in his loss to Kathleen Blanco and in his recent victory.

Kudos on some bit of non partisanship. Like I said to Zero her IQ has little to do with her interview performance. She is being over coached and it shows and combined with her voice and good looks brings out the stereotype. I'm surprised that Democrats are taking that route but then again I'm usually surprised how low Democrats reach.

[Wagner]

Wow I get mentioned even when I'm not involved

[Thunder22]

Originally Posted by Wagner

Wow I get mentioned even when I'm not involved

so does a box of rocks

[Wagner]

Originally Posted by gresch

so does a box of rocks

[MrLabGuy]

Originally Posted by Wagner

Wow I get mentioned even when I'm not involved

Unlike others here we don't seem to focus on the (D) or the (R) behind a candidates name come election time. I only wish that was true for the majority of the voters because I believe it would lead to better candidates in the primary elections when we actually have some decent choices. It seems when we get down to the final two it becomes the lesser of two evils.

[Wagner]

Originally Posted by MrLabGuy

Unlike others here we don't seem to focus on the (D) or the (R) behind a candidates name come election time. I only wish that was true for the majority of the voters because I believe it would lead to better candidates in the primary elections when we actually have some decent choices. It seems when we get down to the final two it becomes the lesser of two evils.

Always, because remember...it is "too hard" to get a 3rd party in. Sad sad sad...so people seem to flock to whomever is most like them instead of who is best for the job.