View Single Post
  #7  
Old 02-26-2006, 05:12 PM
x5GuyInLA's Avatar
x5GuyInLA x5GuyInLA is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 987
x5GuyInLA is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quicksilver
Digital recordings also sound much better. IMHO the iPod dosn't help improve the signal path either which is why I kept the CD Changer. Experiment with different music and you may find a vast difference in mastering, an art that seems to have fallen on death ears. In my personal experience I prefer not having that booming bass and have found that the X5 does indeed render some recordings with excellent clarity. But again as I mentioned IMHO it really depends on the recording. Here's a good example of what I mean.http://tinyurl.com/3jak


I have both the cd changer(alpine s634 w blitzsafe(?) adapter) and the aux input. When listening to the same mp3s, the music played from the cd changer is so much crisper w/ better bass response than when I have the mp3 player hooked up to the aux input. Maybe it's the mp3 player, but I think that some of the sound quality is lost through the aux input. I'm a basshead, and while the bass is not overwhelming, which is what I like, it's pretty clean and loud enough when I use the changer. It also does depend on the type of music you listen to. Mellower music would probably sound pretty good, although Nelly's "Grillz" actually hits pretty well.
__________________
If you feel the need to bash/rag/insult/demean someone, please read this before you do. Thanks and have a great day!
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links