View Single Post
  #3  
Old 03-31-2017, 07:46 PM
deepblonde's Avatar
deepblonde deepblonde is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Australia, Melbourne
Posts: 286
deepblonde is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z06Luke View Post
I was noticing that the F15 35D is rated at 5 mpg higher on the highway than the E70 is. That's a considerable increase. I have tried to find out what changes were made that account for the MPG increase but I have been unable to find much information. The only changes that I am certain of that I can think that might have any contribution are as follows:

-Aerodynamics - We all know there were styling changes, but I do not believe the relatively minor design changes could possibly have a very significant of effect on economy.

-Transmission gearing - The F15 got the 8 speed auto, although the 8th gear ratio is very similar to the 6th gear ratio in the E70 (.69:1 compared to .67:1). This is nearly a zero change and would have minimal effect on MPG.

-Axle gearing - This is the only major difference that I can see. The E70 has a 3.64:1 final drive, where the F15 has a 3.15:1 final drive. Using a 255/55/18 tire (29" diameter), the E70 turns 1750RPM @ 60mph, where the F15 turns 1500RPM @ 60mph.

Can a change of 250RPM truly be the only significant change that provides a gain of 5 MPG?
The first gen e70 had the 6-speed ZF, the facelift e70 already got the 8-speed ZF from about 2010, including the revised rear axle ratio (3.15 to 1).

The F15 got electric steering which , according to ZF and BMW was supposed to have fuel economy benefit.
Also the F15 has a completely different ECU engine map, compared to the e70.
__________________
X5 E70 3.0d M-Sport , 2010 Titan Silver , ZF 6HP28, 320hp.

X5 E53 3.0d Sport, 2006 LeMans Blue, ZF 6HP26, diesel .
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links