Originally Posted by EODguy

Well here's how I look at it...

America has the Bill of Rights so being locked down without being the "confirmed" infected has never been done and was only addressed in the courts via the (typhoid Mary) case and was the only time it was found Constitutional to lock someone up for the harm they would pose since she didn't obey the order not to work as a cook. The violation of anyone's Rights is illegal.

If the PPE provides protection then not opening things up is ignorant, because someone NOT using PPE doesn't have any effect on those who wear PPE.

NO government makes money as they are not a producer. The money they spend is collected from the citizens in the form of taxes, so getting $$$ from the government is truly robbing Peter to pay Paul and the economic follow on is very easy to get past the tipping point.

Wear PPE and practice social distancing and it doesn't interfere with anyone's Inalienable Rights but if you flip that theory and force people to stay out of work, lose their homes, lose their jobs or retirement then the people who want this must believe that the Constitution can be arbitrarily changed based on whomever is in power.

Remember that a law is used to punish people for breaking the rules NOT to stop them from breaking the rules.

Freedom isn't something that is passed down from generation to generation. Freedom is only as strong as those willing to fight and/or die safeguarding and nurturing it.

Sent from my SM-A730F using Tapatalk