Originally Posted by EODguy

Try this....

Flynn was the incoming NSA and that during the transition he spoke to Russian ambassador Kislyak (remember as transition this is legal/common and his job) the "investigation was whether he violated the Logan Act (illegal for individuals to conduct business on behalf of the US government without authorization) and since it was his actual job for the government then there should never have been an investigation since all it could produce is known to most people as "fruit of the poisonous tree" as for the "Did you discuss xxx?" so that people understand if you aren't authorized to have been on that conversation, FBI or not Flynn would have been in legal jeopardy just for saying "yes" and verifying the contents of the call and the need to know is not determined by the FBI by Flynn and the (at that time) President elect. Couple that with the 302's saying "Logan Act or try to get him to lie?"

I point out an article on the Hill website which is NOT a ra-ra-ra Trump website

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciar...-cant-prove-it

Also the link to the 302's (file too large for upload here)

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/...92.188.0_8.pdf

I don't care whether someone is a Republican or Democrat, Trump supporter or Trump hater as long as they believe and support the Constitution and the Rights of the People not just for "their" side.

Also a perusal of a dictionary may be in order as "Conspiracy Theory" denotes a belief without evidence of something to be a fact.

Sent from my SM-A730F using Tapatalk