Quote:
Originally Posted by EODguy
So consider yourself uninformed. Flynn wasn't mirandized and if you had read the 302's you would see zero reference to him being read his Rights. Might actually be there but since the original actual 1st 302 was lost so the FBI had Lisa Page type up a record of the 302 as was recreated by Peter Strzok.
What you have attempted to say in your post lacks the understanding that if I am a cop investigating a case like someone burnt their property and used it as a means to collect insurance payments (arson) and I came to your office and said "Do you know if that guy down the road set the fire intentionally?"
And to this you say NO... remember that you were NOT read your Rights. Do you know why? Because the investigation is trying to bring a case against someone else, but if you lied about it... you would be open for a charge of (obstruction of justice and making a false statement) all without being mirandized.
A case is just like a house... it has to have a good foundation or there's no hope that everything will stay plum and true by the time you put a roof on. Conversely having a super strong foundation and construction of walls won't mean shit if you get a roof put on that is poorly constructed, since wind and rain will destroy even the good work below.
Sent from my SM-A730F using Tapatalk
|
Saying you don't know when you do can be obstruction. If the investigation uncovered that you did, that is when one would be mirandized if the police decided to arrest the neighbor. At that point the neighbor still has the option to plead guilty, not guilty, or make a deal before court.
Flynn confessed twice. Would you confess if you weren't guilty?