Quote:
Originally Posted by ard
You have a computer, right? lemme know where you get your news. fox, oan, washingon times...brietbart...
Or will you say 'only cnn, sky and aljazira'...I never look at ANY other websites?
So why did Flynn plead guilty- twice? Was he lying when he said "I am guilty"?
Flynn and his son have legal exposure far beyond a 302 about lying. He was implicated in a series of issues and violations- from FARA to lobbying for (hostile) foreign governments to working to kidnap someone for rendition to Turkey. Federal proisecurots had the goods on him, and they kindly agreed to only charge him for the minor charge of lying. They let him off the hook BIG TIME and let him plead to lying. (Dont you remember that Flynn was a ‘cooperating witness’????? Or are we conveniently forgetting all this? If he was ONLY guilty of lying, and plead to lying, why would he ‘cooperate”????)
Now, with Toady Barr running DOJ, Flynn’s defense gets to pretend “its only a little misstatement, look at the 302s” when in fact it is FAR more. Yet Barr will prevent any new charges, Barr is letting Flynn escape justice. It is a perversion of our justice system.
If Barr didnt have his full body weight on the scales of justice, there is utterly no way his new attorneys could Have pulled this stunt.
Barr is now corrupting DOJ with (your) argument that its all about 'only the interview'. Flynn is guilty, was guilty, and plead to this to avoid much larger issues. You wanna pretend it is only some minor misstatement, have at it. The good patriots that interviewed him and managed this righteous investigation disagree. And are getting their careers ruined by Barr and the political scumbags to protect Trumps scumbag.
You claim this isnt political! This is the height of a political smear.
Im not going to cast aspersions on your patriotism, and you shouldnt do that to me. You have utterly NO idea who I am nor what Ive done.
Given your position on Flynn, Id love to delve into your beliefs about Gallagher and Lorance.... more persecution by Obama/deep state/corrupt military brass? Or you gonna surprise me here? What the Lorance debacle has done to his unit is utterly disgusting.
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Since you seem to think you are so worldly and know about access to sites worldwide I'm posting a screenshot of OAN when in the Middle East and by the way Fox is a paid access site if you want to watch the news... [emoji849]
The answer to your question about why Flynn pled guilty is simple so you should be able to understand.
1.The DoJ is effectively without limits on power and funding when they are against anyone other than another government and if they don't think they will win in court they will do everything to strip you of the means to fight through threats, delays, spending, etc. (I.E. Cold War = outspending to win) As for why he was a (cooperating witness) the government's own paperwork said if he answered questions in other investigations (Russia, Russia) they would recommend a slap on the wrist with a felony conviction and not to find "something" on his son or if not they would recommend the maximum (gee not rocket surgery)
2. Per your "Flynn was implicated" statement since NO charges were brought it's not even up for discussion. Unless you think that someone saying "He did xyz" but we can't indict due to lack of proof should have to be proven innocent then you don't understand the Rights people have in America and I guess you shouldn't be concerned if someone were to "implicate" that you are into paedophilia. Correct?
3. Your... "Flynn is guilty, was guilty, pled guilty" is pure unadulterated bullshit simply due to the fact that in AMERICA you are still innocent until found guilty in a court of law. That means a trial, not some numpty's opinion. Thankfully....
I personally couldn't give a rat's ass about anyone's political affiliation, but when someone bases their every viewpoint solely on the fuck the Democrats or fuck the Republicans then they have zero ethics and I say again that is the exact same way racists think/believe.
I was NOT casting aspersions about your patriotism. I was very clear that you lack beliefs other than you hate Trump so much that you don't want to judge someone on facts only on "he's Trump's guy" so fuck him and any Constitutional Rights.
You are correct that I don't "know" you and what you've done, but I can get pretty close in my guess through deductive reasoning of what you have said previously.
A. You are upper middle class.
B. You have a college degree.
C. You are married and most likely between 45 and 55 years old.
D. You have followed the Democrat party almost exclusively except for the few times you threw your lot in with Bernie Sanders types and those CPUSA times in college.
E. You are very vocal in standing up for the little guy, but only when it was 100% nonpolitical or dealt with issues that align with your hobbies/passions i.e. BMW, etc. and conversely stand against anyone whose beliefs are not the same as your own even if they have the same interests or hobbies as you and have conflated politics with patriotism.
As for Chief Gallagher I actually have quite a few connections in the special operations community (Triple Canopy & EOD), and his case comes down to youngsters who had trouble dealing with old school operators and the dark humor that gets used. One who then admitted in the court martial that Eddie didn't kill the prisoner.
The 1LT Clint Lowrance case is also one I am very familiar with due to the fact I donate vehicles and money to UAP to pay for attorneys for service members who are wrongfully accused or convicted of war crimes and support their dependents while in Leavenworth. Clint was convicted when a few of the problem children (previous commander's name for them) were under investigation for misdeeds months prior and miraculously were dropped from prosecution when they made their statements against Clint and said he was violating the law of warfare (he'd taken over a little more than a week before the supposed incident) yet come to find out that the 3 Afghans killed were all known Al Qaeda members (Haqqani) yet the JAG claimed that they were all innocent civilians and didn't disclose that fact to the court or defense. [emoji849]
Try some research into America.
https://books.google.com.sa/books/ab...on&redir_esc=y
Sent from my SM-A730F using Tapatalk