Quote:
Originally Posted by EODguy
|
I'm about half-way through this... and so far, all I've learned, is that the author is very long winded, and that he is a strict Constitutionalist. I am Constitution oriented (both parties are habitually violating it) as well but am also realistic enough to know that not everything can be enumerated in the original document.
But let me finish reading it and digest it. Seems to me he's complaining about a situation that applies to all the justices, but for different reasons (feminism in RBG's case).