You agree that forcing people to do things against their will is a violation of their Rights, but then you completely dismiss your statement with...
"You won't have to be angry about any COVID mandates if you get vaccinated before they're in place."
Rights have limitations. My comment about COVID and mandates did not imply you should be forced. It meant if you were to get vaccinated on your own before any mandates are in place you wouldn't feel forced.
Amazing that you can be so disingenuous or blind.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/b...chology-insult
As for the things about books, I chose a book as an example of something enumerated by the Bill of Rights and you felt it was one of my reasons and missed the point.
Every single thing I attributed to laws about a book in that statement is and would be against the Bill of Rights yet if you replace the word book with (firearm) then you would realize that they are already in place and ignorant, asinine laws are already trampling peoples Rights and all because of a little bit of "good" intention by dumbasses who have come to believe that 51% agreement means they can change or even curtail the Rights of the people.
What ignorant laws are trampling your rights? Majority rules, sorry. My response was you didn't have a point using the examples you posted. Was I was supposed to extrapolate you were talking about firearms? Why didn't you use it as an example in the first place.
We are not a democracy, we are a Republic.
https://act.represent.us/sign/democracy-republic
I will say that if a mandate forces someone to (in this case) get an experimental vaccine and they suffer damage or death then I would not have any issues whatsoever if got retribution on those who cost them to lose a parent, husband, wife or child.
Hundreds of millions have been vaccinated. It's not experimental. The vaccines were tested and approved by the FDA using the same guidelines as any other drug.
You may think some of those ideas of being forced to do other things is an impossibility but already many countries mandate the abortion of special needs children, marriage, etc.
A lot can be learned from history and what happens in other countries. However, applying them to the US
without studying the circumstances is dangerous. Rather than being constantly angry about the potential of mandates for anything else, I suggest it would be better for your health to address the imaginary horribles if they were to ever become a reality. As for stopping the horrible covid19 with a fatality rate of 1% or less... I am unconcerned about what you do or don't do. During the war on terror 10% of EOD troops were killed and almost the same percentage were wounded so I don't worry about some ultra low odds of death from this.
There have been about 7000 soldiers killed since 911--One is too many. It is not about the percentages it is about the number that have died. 10% of the whole 7000 is 700. This discussion is not about you or me and certainly not about what level of risk COVID is meaningful to anyone. I assume you are saying you were an EOD. Over 800,000, just in the US, have died from COVID. Regardless of the odds it is still gambling. Sometimes you win sometimes you lose. I hope you win.
After reading your replies I take it back about you getting a refund from Harvard. I believe they should pay you, to never let anyone know you graduated.
What is your obsession with Harvard? They don't even have a good football team.
Sent from my SM-A730F using Tapatalk