|
a comparison would be helpful
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingonit
...The fuel trims are now quite consistent, with long-term on both banks (the same reading on both) at 11.72 (sometimes at 10.94), while the short term readings are now mostly in the negative 2-6 range (the bank 2 is closer to zero than the bank 1). From what I've been reading about fuel trims, mine aren't too bad (I've yet to see examples from another M54, though)....
|
Set the three codes again this morning, but also observed momentary short-term fuel trims of plus 10.5 to plus 11.7 (falling back quickly to plus 2 to plus 6), while the long-term fuel trims remained at 11.72, as usual. This was on my Torque Pro app, which didn't record a freeze-frame; I haven't looked with either of my hand-held scanners, yet.
Once again, I have no comparison standard to measure against, because I've yet to find what fuel trims are normal for a M54 engine. What do you guys normally see with your 3.0i engines?
__________________
01 BMW X5 E53,3.0i-5L40E, 7/13/01
topas-blau,Leder-grau,"resto-project car"
Here:
14 Lexus ES350,3.5L-U660E
09 HHR Panel,2.2L-4T45E
04 Chevy 2500HD,6.0L-4L80E
98 GMC Sierra 1500,5.7L-4L60E
Gone:
66 Chevelle Malibu 2dr ht.,327>441c.i.-TH350>PGlide/transbrake
08 Cobalt Coupe,2.2L-4T45E
69 & 75 C10s,350c.i.-TH350
86 S10,2.8L-700R4
73 Volvo 142,2.0L-MT4
72 & 73 VW SuperBeetles,1.6l-MT4
64 VW,1.2l-MT4
67 Dodge Monaco 500 2dr ht.,383c.i.-A727
56 Chevy 210 4dr,265c.i.-PGlide
|