Quote:
Originally Posted by crystalworks
When you start asking about evidence, we end up in a circular discussion about how your evidence is superior, and thus your conclusion is superior. I won't be drawn into that again.
ALL ORIGINS OF CV19 ARE THEORIES. The Wuhan lab theory is the most plausible/likely, in my opinion. That's after reviewing the evidence presented for the most plausible theories, "wet market theory," natural origin theory, and "Wuhan lab theory." If YOU have evidence I may have not seen, please present it, and perhaps I'll change my mind.
|
Best way to stay out of this is not get in it. Especially if you jump in with criticism. When someone presents what they claim is factual evidence, I should not respond if I disagree?
I don't feel superior to anyone nor do I think anything I post is superior or the last word. I think threads like this are primarily for entertainment purposes. It is funny to me how quickly some folks turn to defensive insults as if it discredits another persons opinions. When that is the norm of anyone I do feel somehow they missed one of lifes' most important lessons. Insults are never productive or appropriate. If that sounds like I think I am superior then I am fine owning it.
I've posted my sources when this has come up in the past. Check the COVID thread. I don't think there is anything here that is new information. I am much more concerned about how we botched the opportunities to reduce the number affected by COVID, especially the number that died, in order to better our response in the future. We did an unforgivable disgusting job from the very beginning.