Originally Posted by crystalworks

You totally missed the point of my post. Or chose to ignore it, and focused on the personal in my second post. My first post stated MY belief with no mention of you. Once more:

"ALL ORIGINS OF CV19 ARE THEORIES. The Wuhan lab theory is the most plausible/likely, in my opinion. That's after reviewing the evidence presented for the most plausible theories, "wet market theory," natural origin theory, and "Wuhan lab theory." If YOU have evidence I may have not seen, please present it, and perhaps I'll change my mind."

Yes, all are theories, have not challenged that. Nor have I said it couldn't have come from the lab. I haven't seen anything convincing either way so haven't taken a firm stand.


Okay, so I've seen the evidence you are referring to since it was posted previously. Once again, I believe the most likely origin was the Wuhan lab theory, you are obviously free to believe different. But like I can't post any 100% definitive evidence, nor can you. We are each choosing a theory.

Again I have no problem with any opinion. I have not taken a position because we have only theories, just posting something different to consider.

As for how it was handled. Hindsight is 20/20, and there were certainly things that should have been done differently. Once vaccines became available the country should have 100% opened up. No restrictions. Masks totally voluntary, etc.

Self admittedly, you enjoy frustrating others in your conversation, and some of those people turn to insults (even I might have at some point and I'm fairly even tempered). Insults, though not the most productive form of conversation, don't make anyone wrong either. I'm sure you perceive it as debate skill superiority frustrating others, and that's fine. I perceive it as others just not believing you have a genuine interest in back and forth discussion.