Quote:
Originally Posted by EODguy
"EOD posts a peer reviewed article on HCQ in **cell cultures"""...totally pointless in supporting a claim of clinical efficacy in a population of humans. I mean there are more- fraudulent studies, quacks creating meta analyses of previously withdrawn trials to create unsupported claims. Just hackery" ~ard
ARD thinks this study from (2005) is "fake" and part of the studies done about HCQ during the pandemic, even though it was done by the CDC and their Canadian counterparts.[emoji849]
Yeah let's try something that ARD might understand... like righty tighty, lefty loosey.
I'm sure he's not a scientist but he should understand basic scientific findings.
I am also sure that the last time he had a piece of ass, was when his fingers broke through the toilet paper. 
Sent from my SM-A730F using Tapatalk |
You're totally missing the point.
If you read the responses to your position you will see that there is no challenge of the study. The point is that the study is not applicable. It is about an entirely different topic that can't be extrapolated to COVID 19. Concluding it is meaningful is a flawed assumption. That is what has been debunked.
Are you capable of posting something where you don't insult someone or be just plain gross?