Thank goodness for the FoIA. Even if it does take 1.5 years to compel release of documents.
While Judicial Watch is undoubtedly right-leaning, and receives large amounts of money from the Kochs, the documents they obtained, are not of their creation. Parsing through them adds more evidence to the Wuhan Lab origination theory/hypothesis/choose your vernacular.
I mean, here is the official National Intelligence Council report that was released Oct 2021:
https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/docum...19-Origins.pdf
Disclosure, I've only read the "key take-aways" in the past, but it gives enough information to summarize the findings. The views are split 4 vs 4 among "Intelligence Community Elements."
4 of them say ("with low confidence") that it was a natural mutation that originated in China.
1 says it was likely ("with moderate confidence") that it was a laboratory incident originating at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
3 elements "remain unable to coalesce around either explanation without additional information, with some analysts favoring natural origin, others a laboratory origin, and some seeing the hypotheses as equally likely."
If the intelligence community as a whole is split (or uncertain) on this issue... I feel pretty confident in my logic-based belief after seeing the evidence continue to trickle out.
Unfortunately, as stated before, I don't believe China would EVER let the proof of a laboratory incident/accident/etc see the light of day. And I also fully believe that it has already been destroyed. So an accurate conclusion of what happened will likely never be realized.