|
beauty (of fuel-efficient cruising) is in the eye of the beholder
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Salty B.
...My non-sport X5 is a fine cruiser. It's got the basic 17" wheels which means tall tires and soft(er) ride. Sure could use an overdrive tho...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bdc101
...Same here, I have the 17" wheels as well and it's a wonderfully comfortable cruiser - but man I like to keep the speeds low. Not just for MPG but also because it revs SO high! I took a couple road trips to Idaho last fall, where they have 80mph speed limits on the interstate, and everybody goes 90.
|
My '01 X5 has 17's also, and cruises just great at 75-80 mph. The automatic 5L40E tranny has a .75:1 ratio in fifth gear, that really helps lower the rpms that the 4.11 final drive causes. It has been my favorite highway cruiser from the last few decades; only my '67 Dodge Monaco 500 (383 magnum V-8, 3.23 rear gear ratio) cruised better, but then, my memories of it are 50+ years-old). My wife's '14 Lexus ES350 is a smoother, softer, more fuel-efficient cruiser, but it isn't an X5 !!
Using this rpm calculator https://www.crawlpedia.com/rpm_gear_calculator.htm, it shows my 3.0i is at 2679 rpm @75 mph (compare that to the 2547 rpms that my '04 Chevy 2500HD gets, with a taller 30.5" tire and same final drive ratios). The BMW 3.0i uses less gas than the 6.0l LS V-8 that the pickup has, though (15-20 mpg for the BMW 3.0i vs 13-15 mpg "max" for the Chevy 6.0l).
I can live with that, since I formerly drove my old '66 Chevelle (before I converted it to full-race), and my '69 C-10 daily driver/tow vehicle, with 3.73 rear gears and no overdrive gearing in the transmission(s) (both had TH350 trannys at the time). Very poor fuel mileage, but theywere fun. - The Chevelle had a 427 c.i engine, a 800 cfm Holley double-pumper carb, and 28" tires (450+ whp, 7-10? mpg, 3357 rpm@ 75mph), and
- the C-10 had a 355 c.i. engine, a 750 cfm Holley street carb, and 31" tires (380 whp, 11-13? mpg, 3032 rpm@75 mph)
You should've seen the highway rpms when I switched to 4.56 rear gears on the Chevelle, just as I was switching it to full-race status (4104 rpm @75 mph).
In its' final configuration, it had a different engine, with 14:1 compression, 441 c.i. (solid-roller-cammed), a 1053 cfm Holley 4150 double-pumper carb or a 1200 cfm Holley Dominator 4500 carb (depending on whether I was racing 1/8th mile or 1/4 mile tracks, and cool or hot weather...different intakes and tune-ups were used, also). (4392 rpm @75 mph) Very low mpg on expensive 118 octane fuel !!
__________________
01 BMW X5 E53,3.0i-5L40E, 7/13/01
topas-blau,Leder-grau,"resto-project car"
Here:
14 Lexus ES350,3.5L-U660E
09 HHR Panel,2.2L-4T45E
04 Chevy 2500HD,6.0L-4L80E
98 GMC Sierra 1500,5.7L-4L60E
Gone:
66 Chevelle Malibu 2dr ht.,327>441c.i.-TH350>PGlide/transbrake
08 Cobalt Coupe,2.2L-4T45E
69 & 75 C10s,350c.i.-TH350
86 S10,2.8L-700R4
73 Volvo 142,2.0L-MT4
72 & 73 VW SuperBeetles,1.6l-MT4
64 VW,1.2l-MT4
67 Dodge Monaco 500 2dr ht.,383c.i.-A727
56 Chevy 210 4dr,265c.i.-PGlide
|