I appreciate your concern, and I understand why those others were modifying their MAF signals, but still, if by tricking the DME into reading an incorrect, but not TOO far from correct, MAF signal, then perhaps I can make up for the assumed (cheap $20) MAF sensor's built-in inaccuracy. I had no hope for the original Siemens MAF after that last trip, so it was sacrificed for science.

I might not use my device, at all, if my preliminary tests are unsatisfactory. I still have the emissions and safety inspection to pass, later this month, so it'll most likely be November before I'm ready to try.

__________________
01 BMW X5 E53,3.0i-5L40E, 7/13/01
topas-blau,Leder-grau,"resto-project car"

Here:
14 Lexus ES350,3.5L-U660E
09 HHR Panel,2.2L-4T45E
04 Chevy 2500HD,6.0L-4L80E
98 GMC Sierra 1500,5.7L-4L60E

Gone:
66 Chevelle Malibu 2dr ht.,327>441c.i.-TH350>PGlide/transbrake
08 Cobalt Coupe,2.2L-4T45E
69 & 75 C10s,350c.i.-TH350
86 S10,2.8L-700R4
73 Volvo 142,2.0L-MT4
72 & 73 VW SuperBeetles,1.6l-MT4
64 VW,1.2l-MT4
67 Dodge Monaco 500 2dr ht.,383c.i.-A727
56 Chevy 210 4dr,265c.i.-PGlide