View Single Post
  #44  
Old 04-16-2006, 12:04 AM
fln8tive's Avatar
fln8tive fln8tive is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,458
fln8tive is on a distinguished road
Engine damge vs a paltry savings aside, isn't it a zero sum argument anyway? Before the X5, the Volvo R would run fine on 87 but a tank of 91 or 93 yielded more miles, so I've only run the 91 or 93 in the X. I only fill up about every 10 days, so if burning premo is an issue, I need to be looking at a bus pass.
__________________
2004 X5 4.4i
Sterling Grey/Black Sport Prem 132s/Diamaris Rear Climate OEM Nav/Sirius RBs AngelBrights Roundel Valve Caps, 35% front tint. Sold MArch 2012




Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links