I realise there will always be turf wars, and I have no problem with either an experienced (interventional) cardiologist or radiologist interpreting the images, as it's my opinion that there is a reason a cards fellowship and rad residency and fellowship are as long as they are. I just have a problem with inexperienced docs interpreting studies, that's the sole pupose for my initial question. Just wanted to ensure that your studies are being interpreted accurately, and that you're not paying out of pocket for a substandard exam/interpretation.