Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lambeau
What, terrorism isn't an ACTUAL threat? North Korea didn't commit the atrocities on 9/11. Do you realize how many terrorists we've already killed in Iraq & Aghanistan? Could we have already killed a terrorist there that may have one day came to America to harm you or your loved ones? Was it not worth it then????
I couldn't imagine the pacifists being in favor for military action in NK if they weren't for military action in Iraq!!!
|
Lambeau, I like your single focused fervor, but few here are opposed to tossing "terrorists" wherever they might be ensconced. Whether the fiasco in Iraq is really reducing/limiting/slowing/"stopping" terrorism by the jihad zealots is another question.
No pacifist here, and not sure any "pacifist" responded to this thread, (but I do like your jump to labelling and conclusions
), but R.Wagner's initial point is that NK could represent some serious trouble to its neighbors, eg Japan, et al, and their very real potential of tactical nukes, flingable near the old US, in the future, may be a threat more
acute than all the crazed towel heads picked off by our beloved armed services.
Not speaking for Wagner, nor interpolating his ideas, but the NK point is that this former "axis of evil member" as espoused by our dear leader, W, is barely on the talk circuit/press radar scope, pun intended.
I'm not "for" another ground troop anywhere on the planet, currently, as I am pressed to discern their effect other than the horrible affected situ on many of our troops. But, some sword rattling, serious azz embargos and more, may get the weird lil'leader's attention...or, it may not, but that crazy MF'er may have some serious toys to play with compared to your basic sand terrorist whom is working with fertilizer and diesel.
BR,mD
BR,mD