I'm not a fan of Sharpton (or Jackson), however, I do appreciate what they have tried to accomplish for civil rights etc. over their careers. Sharpton's approach can certainly change, but his purpose is valid.

When I first came to the US I lived in NYC and remember seeing on the news that a black teen had killed another in order to get a pair of shoes. That's when I was actually introduced to the term "black-on-black crime" when I saw Rev. Sharpton speaking about it and the need for the black community and chuches to step-up it's role in trying to educate and prevent it in the future. Rev. Sharpton used some alarming statistics about this type of crime and made strong mention that the way to reduce it starts at the home.

When we moved to LA Rev Sharpton was once again one of the central figures in helping reduce violence creating peace between the various street gangs of LA (most notably the Crips and Bloods). I can't speak for what google brings up on Sharpton and his stance on black on black crime, but I can speak for what I've seen him take on.

Now, is he a glory hound? Maybe, but he does bring a certain type of attention to an issue when he gets involved and prevents items from being 'swept under the rug'. Regardless of his tactics, I do appreciate his efforts.

I understand your hesitation in speaking out 'against him' as a white person. However, I don't find your comments offensive in any way. There are many people that don't support Sharpton or Jackson based on their agendas, ability or by judging on how they have handled past situations.

The Cocaine ordeal and the Ms Brawley issue are valid items to point to as reasons not to support Sharpton and any leader or politician black or not should be fairly scrutinized and called to the carpet based on thier actions. Thanks for being sensitive to the issue and for sharing you unbiased opinion - I know that can be hard to feel safe doing in ultra PC times.