Quote:
|
Originally Posted by B&DCalgary
Sounds like the concept of Occam's Razor is beyond your comprehension. There is absolutely no way a complicated conspiracy like what you seem to think has occured could be pulled off in the U.S. There would be far too many leaks.
|
You mean leaks like the ones quoted above?
Or do you mean leaks from people who worked for angencies like NORAD or the FAA? I can post a quotes and interviews from such people as well.
There have been tons of leaks. They simply are not reported by the mainstream media. Just as this guy Willie Rodriguez has been ignored, so have the dozens of others who tell stories that conflict the "official" conspiracy theory.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by B&DCalgary
Don't you think it strange that every engineering and demolition expert familiar with building destruction has stated the buildings fell exactly as expected given the damage inflicted by the aircraft.
|
I would find it strange if that was indeed the case. But that is simply not true. In the days following 9/11/01, there were articles in local newspapers all over the country in which experts from this field wrote that neither the fires nor the plane impacts could not have caused the collapse of the 3 WTC towers. I remember they quoted the CEO of one of the large steel companies saying "if we could melt steel with jet fuel, we could save billions of dollars per year".
Then about a week later most of them recanted their statements and said something different. But several have stuck to their initial opinions.
And today, the engineers themselves cannot even come to an agreement on what caused the buildings to colapse. Some say it was the fires, others say that is impossible because jet fuel does not burn hot enough and instead it was the impact of the planes. The 9/11 Commission avoids the subject entirely simply saying that they collapsed. The 9/11 Commission also fails to mention anything about WTC building #7 which also collapsed that day.
Here is physics professor Steven Jones talking about it:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=WVzRllLq-...related&search
He managed to get a sample of the molten metal found in the wreckage of the WTC, and his studies show the presence of thermyte, the explosive used by demolition crews. For the molten metal to be present at all, the fires would have had to reach over 3000 degrees. This is a problem when jet fuel burns at only 800 degrees.
Then you have Larry Silverstein, the owner of the WTC complex, saying in a television interview that evening that they demolished WTC #7. I guess when he said it, he did not realize that such a demolition would take days to prepare and would have had to be set up prior to 9/11 for it to be possible. I guess someone advised him of that after the interview, and the next day he said he "mispoke". Here is a video of that interview:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=u0scE7bQWdk
There is lots of information from both witnesses and "insiders" out there, but the mainstream media simply ignores them. You have to go to some of these events or read some of the websites to hear about them. Otherwise you will be of the opinion that they simply do not exist.