Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pseto
Reid's decision was wrong and lost them a chance to win the game. They went for it on 4th and 10, so why not 4th and 15? The defense hadn't stopped Deuce all day. If the Saints gave him the ball more, he woulda ran for 200 yds+. I couldn't believe a pass happy coach like Reid didn't go for it b/c they made a lot of big plays throughout the year. also, you don't know that the Saints woulda just run the ball although conventional wisdom would lead you believe they would have. Sean Payton's team led the NFL in passing and may have called for a pass if necessary. They also knew that a 1st down puts it out of reach. Reid even second guessed himself afterwards in the press conference. He'll be crucified all offseason for that decision with many calling for his head.
|
not even the clueless media is questioning reid's call. 4th and less than 5 is converted approx 50% of the time. probability goes way down 10yds or more, and obviously keeps getting worse the longer the distance. coaches are paid to play the percentages. additionally, had the eagles not converted the 4th down, the saints could have gained less than 10yds and kicked a FG, and forcing the eagles to have to score a TD with whatever time was left. imo, this is football 101 stuff. i played D-1 football.
here are philly headlines:
Eagles' Super Bowl dream, improbable comeback end
By Bob Brookover, Inquirer Staff Writer </SPAN>
McAllister and Bush do the job
By Marc Narducci, Inquirer Staff Writer </SPAN>
Bob Ford | Defense falters at the end
By Bob Ford, Inquirer Columnist </SPAN>
Ashley Fox | Stallworth was the spark, but Birds ran out of gas
By Ashley Fox, Inquirer Columnist
Eagles' Super Bowl dream, improbable comeback end
Phil Sheridan | The Big Hurt
Ashley Fox | Stallworth was the spark, but Birds ran out of gas
Stephen A. Smith | Garcia simply measured up