Curious as to how that proposition is fair? I can see how it worked for you, considering you paid $150 for the Predator Ice and Dave gave you a competitive upgrade, which to me, sounds like you just paid the difference between the PIs and the iBrights. For me, it's about principle...it would be one thing if the iBrights 1.0 worked perfectly and I wanted to upgrade, I'd gladly pay for the upgrade...it's another when there are issues to begin with. He's already made money off of the original, why should he make another $100 for switching a defective product? Doesn't make sense.