Hey everyone-

With finals starting on Monday -- and my Remedies final on Wednesday -- I was wondering whether anyone had any good pointers for how to approach a problem?

Our prof gave us a pretty cool approach: first ID the wrong committed. Then attack it first as a tort; then a breach of K; finally as unjust enrichment. Analyze the appropriate legal and equitable remedies (if any) for each branch.

So this definitely works, but i'm having a hard time SEEEEEEEEEEEEING all the stuff once i get a fact pattern.

Just thought there might be some cool pointers any of you might offer.

Thanks!!

__________________
MARC/CROSVS | UCLA Bruin, B.A. Econ, Aug 2004 | J.D., Thomas Jefferson School of Law, May 2008 -- MEMBER: California State Bar, December 4, 2008

2005 BMW 645 Cabrio | Black Sapphire Metallic, Ti trim | 6AT | fully loaded sans HUD

2000 Ford Mustang V6 | laser red on tan | 5-spd | track-prepped