Interesting angle for the article. Instead of highlighting which vehicles were the best they chose to focus on the BMW being last in the comparison. Even then they're a bit misleading with the phrase "worst in side-impact crash test". It implies the rating was the worst possible rather than placing last in the comparison. I also noticed the article doesn't reveal the actual rating for the BMW, which was M (marginal) rather than the worst possible rating of P (poor).

Still, it's disappointing that the BMW didn't perform better in the test.

__________________
Wake up every day that would be a start.