Based on a conversation I had with one of the executive producers at CNN about 10 years ago, I'd have to say that I think he was innocent. Let's just say that there was quite a bit of information CNN's investigative reporters found that was never shown to the public.

You may ask why OJ's defnese team never used this same information to show his innocence. Let's just say that the information would have ruined his reputation just as bad as a guilty verdict would have, and at the time he was hoping to escape this trial with his reputation (which was on par with Michael Jordan before this whole ordeal) undamanged.

Let's just say that while I don't think he killed his wife, he was not 100% completely innocent and very likely had knowledge of who did.

Again, my opinion on this is based on a long conversation I had with a CNN exec a few years back. If you remember, during the trial 75% of CNN's programming was about this.

__________________


my experience on X5world when I spend too much
time posting in political threads in the lounge...