View Single Post
  #14  
Old 09-30-2007, 09:38 PM
Eric5273's Avatar
Eric5273 Eric5273 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 4,458
Eric5273 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quicksilver
Thanks for the info but verizion isn't the service in question. We're talkin GSM here.

The comments you see although they look like the might have come from me is a quote from the posted article.
If AT&T had made a GSM phone without a SIM card (i.e. SIM card built-in & part of the internal board), would that have made it ok then? Because that is essentially what Verizon and Sprint have done with all of their phones.

BTW, I think Apple's only mistake here was to make a statement about the unlocked phones. If they had simply kept their mouth shut and issued this "update" which bricks the unlocked phones, I don't think they could be blamed for anything. They could simply say it was a coincidence and that they cannot guarantee that hacked phones will be compatible with their updates. But instead, they had to issue a statement warning people about unlocked phones, and now it becomes obvious that they are intentionally attempting to cause problems for those people with unlocked iPhones.

Also, Apple is not the only GSM phones that are locked to Network. For years T-Mobile has been selling their "Sidekick" that is locked in the same manner. You cannot install your own software on a Sidekick nor can you use it on another network.
__________________


my experience on X5world when I spend too much
time posting in political threads in the lounge...

Last edited by Eric5273; 09-30-2007 at 09:43 PM.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links