Would that have made WHAT OK.  I don't understand your question.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Eric5273
If AT&T had made a GSM phone without a SIM card (i.e. SIM card built-in & part of the internal board), would that have made it ok then? Because that is essentially what Verizon and Sprint have done with all of their phones.
|
Catch 22. but i believe it was a fair warning.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Eric5273
BTW, I think Apple's only mistake here was to make a statement about the unlocked phones. If they had simply kept their mouth shut and issued this "update" which bricks the unlocked phones, I don't think they could be blamed for anything. They could simply say it was a coincidence and that they cannot guarantee that hacked phones will be compatible with their updates. But instead, they had to issue a statement warning people about unlocked phones, and now it becomes obvious that they are intentionally attempting to cause problems for those people with unlocked iPhones.
|
So what's your point? There are other GSM phones that can be used cross network after unlock.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Eric5273
Also, Apple is not the only GSM phones that are locked to Network. For years T-Mobile has been selling their "Sidekick" that is locked in the same manner. You cannot install your own software on a Sidekick nor can you use it on another network.
|
__________________
"What you hear in a great jazz band is the sound of democracy. “The jazz band works best when participation is shaped by intelligent communication.”
Harmony happens whenever different parts get to form a whole by means of congruity, concord, symetry, consistency, conformity, correspondence, agreement, accord, unity, consonance…….
|