Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lakai
Cities like Baltimore threw millions for their school budget for years and saw results declining instead of rising. These communities insist on thinking that throwing more money into their schools will solve the problem even though everytime its done, things get worse. This is a smart move to show their critics in a way they can relate to while not have to waste millions on a situation that can not be fixed by money alone. If something like this was implemented in middle-class school systems, It would cost too much so it only makes sense to do it in areas and situations where its proven that the kids just don't care. It's sort of like the new tax incentives like the "no capital gains tax" where it only applies to those in the 10% tax bracket who wouldn't have any capital gains to tax in the first place.
|
Paying kids to get better grades is just the start. What's next? Paying them to stay in school? How about paying them to go to college? Perhaps we could also count their attendance and pay them to go to class. This is a bad case of "money solves everything" taken too far.

:
Oh, I suppose if UVa paid me $150 to get an A, then I'll do better in my classes?