Originally Posted by X5Jay

I can't imagine the pictures gave the Pats one iota of an advantage. They change the signs several times per game. That whole thing was total BS.

But, another question(s)....

Why is the steroids scandal only focusing on baseball? What percentage of linemen do you think did/do steroids to either enhance performance or treat an injury? 90%? 95%? 100%? I'd guess it's somewhere in that range. Why is there no focus on football when it comes to steroids? And BTW - I think this is a bunch of crap too. I really don't care if they do them or not...