Thanks for the question.
My point was and still is that we have had people with loads of experience in positions of responsibility weather it's politicians CEO's or whatever and just like anyone else they make a mess of it.
I wasn't talking about politicians in particular but In fact politicians are in the forefront of screwing up, making bad decisions to the extent that it's pathetic.
Will someone with less experience be any better? I haven't got a clue. But the record of men in rulership proves that the results for the most part have not been beneficial for mankind. But then how could it be when the scope of the vision of men in general has been narrow at best and based on selfish motivation. My vision regarding rulership goes far beyond rulership by politicians and Businessmen. But that's a discussion for another time.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gresch
i don't get your point, it's ok for obama to not have experience because those that claimed to have it didn't?
imo, both situations suck, because either way we wind up with an inexperienced president.
One of these days an educated businessman will run for President and put these damn politicians out of a job. We need a CEO type to run USA Inc, not politicians (regardless of political party)
|
__________________
"What you hear in a great jazz band is the sound of democracy. “The jazz band works best when participation is shaped by intelligent communication.”
Harmony happens whenever different parts get to form a whole by means of congruity, concord, symetry, consistency, conformity, correspondence, agreement, accord, unity, consonance…….
