Quote:
|
Originally Posted by B-Line
Hey Wagner, you know I have to bust your balls on this one..
But are you really suggesting that a guy with no arms and no legs has an unfair advantage in his weight class?
I assume that what ever weight class he is in, he is at the far bottom and wrestling guys much heavier. Have you ever seen a 103lb. wrestler with arms and legs?
I think what ever advantages we can perceive him to having because of torso mass, are greatly overwhelmed by not having any real muscles in his arms and legs.
Of course it's a semantic argument. But I don't perceive any wrestling advantage caused by his condition. He deserves all the credit for what he has accomplished.
B
|
Never said he had an advantage....simple postulation  I was expecting some one to get "defensive" though if I brought the topic up 
__________________
An unwavering defender of those I see worth protecting.
"promote the general welfare, not provide the general welfare"
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
|