Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MrLabGuy
If you notice Wagner in my statement it says nothing about condoning violence. Americans are free to protest and that falls under the term "Social Unrest". I further qualified my support based on the "Methods" used. That would exclude any violence or interference with anyone else's rights in the process.
50 rounds was excessive but then again I was not in the courtroom to hear the details. On the surface it seems excessive. I also did not see a racial element from the mix of the officers. My original point merely pointed out that it would have had a racial aspect had all three officers been white. I'm not sure why others have an issue with that observation based on the history of past events.
|
OK, I thought you were saying it was "fine" to riot and crap.
Hey, has Al Sharpton gone outside of Duke and done a huge apology yet??? Still waiting on that one.
__________________
An unwavering defender of those I see worth protecting.
"promote the general welfare, not provide the general welfare"
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
|