I don't understand either.
terI think Government and State messed it all up when they used "marriage" m for a non religous union. Simply what I mean is that they could have given it a different name, but the exact same benefits, and ramifications (of divorce).
Recognize a religious groups "Marriage" and 2 individuals with no religion to have a "civil union" or whatever you decide to call it. Maybe all the people who object to this sort of thing (as the ppl given the option above) can not disagree to 2 people deciding to spend the rest of their life together, as well as getting the benefits of those who are in a religious union.
__________________
--
2005 LeMans Blue e53 4.8is
MODs
///LeMans Blue RBs///Intravee II///Sirius///ACS Spoiler///AiB v3///HID Fogs///LED Tails///
///215 20" Ferric Gray///MTEC Pedals///DVD Headrests///SMG M Wheel///AFE CAI Stage 2
