View Single Post
  #6  
Old 05-22-2008, 10:35 PM
scirocco33's Avatar
scirocco33 scirocco33 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nevada
Posts: 32
scirocco33 is on a distinguished road
Not Quite True

This bill WILL NOT allow the same benefits for military personnel who serve for 3 years as someone who served for 20 years.
The Updated S.22., service members returning from Iraq or Afghanistan could earn up to 36 months of education benefits, equivalent to four academic years. Covered benefits would include the established charges of their program, up to the cost of the most expensive in-state public school; a monthly stipend equivalent to housing costs in their area; and a small stipend per semester for books

The bill would mirror the WWII G.L. bill.
The G.I. Bill (officially titled Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944, PL346, 58 Statutes at Large 284) provided for college or vocational education for returning World War II veterans (commonly referred to as GIs or G.I.s) as well as one year of unemployment compensation. It also provided loans for returning veterans to buy homes and start businesses.

This intent of this bill is to replace the current G.I. bill, which requires service member to pay $1200 during the first year service into the system.

The Government accounting office has determined that we would lose 16% of our armed services personnel after the 3 year term leaving us short of recruits if this bill is signed into law.

This is pure smoke. The Air Force does not even have 3 years terms and plans for 55% attrition after the first enlistment.


As a 25 year Air Force vet, I am all for it.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links