View Single Post
  #10  
Old 05-23-2008, 02:52 PM
MrLabGuy MrLabGuy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bay Area California
Posts: 2,780
MrLabGuy is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by scirocco33
Sadly, I'm neither. I just can't support either party 100% of the time.

As far a this being a spending spree. This is more show than anything else.

Right now, a vast majority of the troops fail to use the benefits they PAY for. There is also a percentage that lose their benefits by not serving 36 months or failing to get a honorable discharge. Making it "free" isn't going to change much.

While I whole hardily agree congress needs to curb pending, just dropping these “essential “ programs from the budget would probably cover the cost.
$2,000,000 to the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service,
$1,000,000 to the Clinton School of Public Service,
$200,000 to the Andre Agassi College Prepara­tory Academy,
$500,000 for Our Piece of the Pie,
$50,000 to Everybody Wins!,
$400,000 to the Montana World Trade Center,
$3,743,014 related to the Formosan subterra­nean termite,
$1,500,000 to the AFL-CIO Working for Amer­ica Institute,
$100,000 for signage and streetscape improvements in the Los Angeles Fashion District, and
$100,000 to the Hunting and Fishing Museum of Pennsylvania.
Both parties suck and I've been registered as a Democrat and a Republican in my lifetime so I don't really fit anywhere in the current party systems. I'm leaning more Conservative now because I live in California and the Liberals here are overboard on almost every issue.

I'm all for giving this benefit and more to every veteran but I'd like to see the benefits weighted more toward those who serve for longer terms or make careers in the military. This would incentive re-enlistment with reward. We can't give our armed forces volunteers enough in my opinion. The reason being is we waste so much of our tax dollars on pork and an inefficient government.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links