IMO.
Flippping on an issue is 'justifiable' when enough details are given that warrant a change. I'm sure plenty of scientists had said "you can't split an atom" then it was done, are they going to not change their position on that
The problem with politicos is they will say anything to get elected. This is noticeable when they in no way can defend their previous position. If you can't say "oh I said that because of these facts at the time, I however have changed my position in light of these knew facts" then you are a flipper
__________________
An unwavering defender of those I see worth protecting.
"promote the general welfare, not provide the general welfare"
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
|