Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MrLabGuy
Wow Krimson...Totally partisan, out of context and missing a lot of information in order to make her look bad.
Here is an example and there is too much wrong with that hit piece to waste my time debunking that trash you call proof.
For instance your source would make you believe she is ONLY in favor of Abstinence discussed in sex education classes.
Palin Supports Abstinence-Only Policies. In 2006, the Eagle Forum Alaska asked Palin whether she would “support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education.” Palin replied, “Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.”
Yet here is an article from the Conservative LA Times (Joke) which is critical of her position but it IS a position that was made more clear by Palin. She is in favor of birth control as part of a sex education curriculum.
Palin's position and I quote:
"I'm pro-contraception, and I think kids who may not hear about it at home should hear about it in other avenues," she said during a debate in Juneau.
Such statements could raise concerns among social conservatives who have been some of Palin's most enthusiastic supporters since she was tapped for the No. 2 spot on the GOP ticket last week.
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics...,3119305.story
You're losing credibility X
|
Hold on... Where did I say this was proof? Quit putting words in my mouth. I said the article contained reference links to other sources.
Do you know what her positions are on those issues? If you do, I'd like to know. I'm just doing a little reasearch trying to find out what her positions are. I didn't ask you to debunk it. There is nothing to debunk.