Here is how I see things...I encourage tough questions on EVERY candidate especially of the candidate I'm supporting. Problem is the media does not appear to be consistent.

I doubt Gibson...Or any other major new outlet anchor would ask Obama "if he really thinks that being a community organizer and a freshmen in the Senate qualifies to hold the office of President".

Then after Obama answers yes continue to harp on the subject belittling his contribution and experience.

Could you see the national media asking this:

(Talking Head) Mr Obama. If you applied for a position in the FBI or Secret Service do you think you would be able to pass the extensive security background check required for such a position?

(Obama)...Yes blah blah blah...

(Talking Head) But Mr. Obama. Your association with the known terrorist William Ayers could disqualify you from obtaining a security clearance for initial entrance into the FBI, or Secret Service.

(Obama) His crime was committed when I was 8 Blah Blah Blah

(Talking Head) Well, it alone might not disqualify you; however, you have associations with others known to have questionable ties such as:

Frank Davis, Communist
Mark Rudd, Communist
Mike Klonsky, Communist
Carl Davidson, Communist
Bernadine Dohrn, Communist
Raila Odinga, Foreign Communist
Rezko, Gangster

Not to mention your admitted past drug use.

(Obama) That is quilt by association blah blah blah

(Talking Head) Precisely, which is why such an extensive background evaluation is given to root out anyone with questionable associations for National Security and High Level Clearance.