Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Quicksilver
#1 Specify what tone she used.
#2 Nobody in the world is neutral about anything.
#3 Point out where she lied about her potential to profit from the outcome
of a book that hasn't been released
I believe I'm going to start calling you rubberman.
You love to stretch information to fit your own set of facts......  |
I am truly surprised by your stance on this matter.
#1 Her tone or performance does not change the fact that she should not have been chosen as the moderator of the ONLY VP debate to avoid any POSSIBLE conflict of interest.
#2 Having a personal opinion as a journalist is different than having a conflict of interest.
#3 She lied by omission by failing to disclose her conflict of interest.
Lastly, Her book had not been released yet but the title has and the book was set to be released on inauguration day when Obama was sworn into office...Thus the title of her soon to be released book.
BTW...Name calling does not suit you well. I suspect you know you've lost the argument.