Quote:
Originally Posted by Quicksilver
It is an interesting problem this health care
thing. I suppose we can all agree health care
for all is a good idea. But if there is a disagreement
regarding the government instituting the plan
then who should put the program in place and how
should it be paid for?
|
Talked to a friend whose daughter has SMA. He is furious about any 'gov' health plan because individuals in his situation see nothing but problems. His exact words 'I'd rather have a slim chance of working with my health care provider to help my daughter than to be told by the government what I'm allowed to have'.
I agree, HC for all is a neat notion, however there is no working model for it that maintains great access, great care at the same time. I get irritated by the "health care is broken" in the USA line. Health care is GREAT in the USA, access and cost might be difficult. My suggestion would be simple, offer all small business (500 or less employees) to write off an insane amount of deductions if they provide 100% health care coverage options for their employees.
__________________
An unwavering defender of those I see worth protecting.
"promote the general welfare, not provide the general welfare"
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
|