Ok stop complaining for one moment and
answer my question..................

It is an interesting problem this health care
thing. I suppose we can all agree health care
for all is a good idea. But if there is a disagreement
regarding the government instituting the plan
then who should put the program in place and how
should it be paid for? Or are you saying that
universal health care is not needed at all?

And don't tell me nothing is wrong with what we
have now. Everybody already knows to same game
cant continue as it is.

When you get to be my age you get to witness the
accelerating cost and regulations associated with
health care, and the other insurance limitations
that can be imposed.

Am I defending Obamas program? Not yet.
It's full of holes at this point. But people need answers

What I find interesting is that people seem to find it
more advantageous (or entertaining) to debate about
the faults of the proposed program rather than come
together with a collective constructive pragmatic
idea instead.

__________________
"What you hear in a great jazz band is the sound of democracy. “The jazz band works best when participation is shaped by intelligent communication.”
Harmony happens whenever different parts get to form a whole by means of congruity, concord, symetry, consistency, conformity, correspondence, agreement, accord, unity, consonance…….