If you feel that way, why don't you set us straight with facts, rather than bashing critics? If the end of life review boards are not in any bills, please educate us on how we are wrong.

And what is the administration trying to do? Are they trying to insure the 47 million allegedly without insurance? Why do they need a 1,000+ page bill with a greatly increased government role at the center of it?

Additionally, a question I've asked in several places that no one has been able to answer is, what does the government do that would be considered efficient? Do people really think that by swallowing a huge chunk of our economy in to the public option will somehow magically bring about cost savings and expedient, quality care? And before you echo the liberal talking points, how would you feel (hypothetically speaking of course) about this bill if the exact same thing were proposed by Bush and a Republican majority?