Originally Posted by nom3rcy

They are silly in the context of this argument because probably cause, reasonable suspicion and lawful contact are already well defined by case law and this bill simply adds that LEOs are allowed to ask about a subject's immigration status once they make that contact. It doesn't outline probable cause etc because it doesn't need to.

I simply feel that the people opposed to this law are not interpreting it correctly, and applying those misinterpretations to what if scenarios are leading them to be against the bill.

Is it really that horrible of a question? "Are you a US citizen?"

How does that question infringe upon your rights?