Touché...

Call it what you wish...over-reaction, nut case, conspiracy theory...it is your opinion. The original/official account is still theory, is it not? When the Chairman of the inquiry insists that he and the commission were set up to fail, and that their inquiry should only be the beginning for further investigative commissions...one can't help but expect further investigative commissions. Instead, what i mostly see is attempts to debunk debunks upon debunks.

I prefer to remain neutral on this...sticking with scattered facts such as zero convictions since the tragedy and await the outcome (in whatever form that may be). We can post links back n forth all day...but imo, until a commission (private, without such conflicts of interest) reconvenes...speculation and theories will continue.

In the meantime, a group of individuals who seem qualified, have discovered what they claim to be physical evidence...what that evidence represents and suggests, is not for me to speculate on but to be witness to it's testing and investigation.

Not all people over-reacted...