Thread: 3.0 vs. 4.4
View Single Post
  #12  
Old 12-30-2010, 01:06 AM
c4racer's Avatar
c4racer c4racer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 819
c4racer is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCL View Post
I never wished for more power with my 2003 3.0 X5. If I wanted to go faster, I wouldn't have been in an X5, I would have been in something that didn't weigh close to 5000 lbs.

But since the topic is reliability, I don't think that the weight of the X5 caused a decrease in reliability of the 3.0. And if I was going for high miles, I would pick a 3.0 over a V8.
I am just a V8 type of guy - I always prefer a V8 in a car or truck. But that's just me. I agree the 3.0 is simpler and should prove to be more reliable going for 200K+ miles, and generally cheaper to run over that timeframe. But the V8 is more fun to drive, IMHO. It's a trade off, but that said I don't think you give up that much in reliability or overall operating costs between a 3.0 and 4.4i. No matter what, when pushing 5K lbs you are not going to be breaking any mpg records, and maint costs are not that much more for a V8. Worth it to me. But that is a personal decision for sure.
__________________
2003 4.6is - SOLD
2003 M5 Imola
2008 Mini Cooper S
2011 Mazda CX9
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links