View Single Post
  #4  
Old 10-01-2012, 04:56 PM
TwinsPoppa's Avatar
TwinsPoppa TwinsPoppa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 3,523
TwinsPoppa is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCL View Post
Twins:

A couple of comments.

You say that the pre x-drive has a locked torque split. That is technically true, but a little misleading IMO. The transfer case has a fixed torque split, but it is certainly not locked. The transfer case is open, and one drive shaft (front or rear) can rotate at a different speed than the other without too much issue. If you have a very large difference, for a long time, then damage can result. Towing with one axle raised and the other axle on the ground is an example; you are limited to a certain speed and distance by BMW.

Tire size differences can certainly cause damage with the pre x-drive transfer case. I would strive for 3-4 revolution per mile difference, but I don't think that is a hard cutoff. When BMW came out with the x-drive transfer case (in the X3) there were actually more problems with tire size differences. X3 models are famous for it, as they have a lighter transfer case than the E53. So I would be just as concerned with an x-drive transfer case and tire size differences, including on the E53/E70, probably more so than with the pre x-drive.
Correction, the non-xdrive transfer case has a fixed front-to-rear torque split.

So, in general and all things being equal, you feel the non-xdrive transfer case would fare better when it comes to using mismatched rolling diameters in the front vs. rear? I'm probably missing something and don't know it.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links