Quote:
Originally Posted by blktoptrvl
Because the accusation is (in part) that he used unlawful methods to achieve his low rate.
If he did do it lawfully, I would not oppose him doing whatever he wants... However, I do think that he should not be entitled to pay such a low rate on such large amounts.
|
Have not heard of such a statement before. Am i missing something? Hope you have evidence to back up your claim. Why should'n he? No law has been broken as far as we know.